Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Merchants of Cool
I think that this technique works well will the Frankfurt school's theory of media manipulation of culture to fuel capitalism. It also fits well with the Cultural Studies approach of media encoding/decoding. In this case the process is dynamic: producers encode a marketable commodity, teens decode the commodity by consuming it, and then producers recode the same commodity to make it look fresh and appetizing after it has gone out of style.
Female Genital Mutilation
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Hackers as Activists
This article is another example of reframing hackers as activists. The staff of wiki leaks has been successful in publishing evidence on the site that has everyone in the US government disturbed, including our current president.
The writer cites Steven levy who researched hackers in the 1980s and found two values hackers believe in:
(1) all information should be free;
(2) mistrust authority and promote decentralization
what I find interesting is the mainstream framing of wiki leaks. In the mainstream media wikileaks is framed as threatening our national security. My questions would be:
Do you agree that asking/demanding transparency of the government is a threat to our national security?
Do you personally share any of these values with the hackers? Should all information be free?
If not, how do we measure what is free and open to the public and what is not?
Also, the internet clearly has the potential for decentralization. Why would people ask for decentralization? And would that desire arise in response to global media control? Is that a reasonable response?
Enjoy the link!
http://www.thenation.com/article/154780/wikileaks-and-hacktivist-culture
5 years later...the Mohammad cartoons
Monday, September 27, 2010
The Mohammed cartoon and Park 51 debates in connection with agenda setting and media manipulation
I want to add this article from the New Yorker a couple weeks ago to our ongoing discussion of global Muslim issues. Lawrence Wright has an interesting perspective on on the Mohammed cartoons, Park 51 and America's Muslim population. He highlights the way in which both the cartoon phenomenon and the Park 51 debate developed as situations in which one politically motivated person used certain--otherwise relatively innocuous occurrences--to draw media attention to themselves and their issues. Essentially, Wright argues that neither of these conflicts would have had the social magnitude that they did had not "fearmongering and slander serve[d] as the basis of an argument that cannot rely on facts to make its case." This article portrays both phenomena as extreme examples of agenda setting by people whose opinions were originally in a minority and who managed, through manipulation of different media outlets and group leaders, to make their issues the concern of an outspoken majority.
Another example of this technique that is salient to the discussion is in the Packer article about social scientists and the war on terror. Packer points out that Bin Laden's inclusion of global warming in a list of complaints against America, was a ploy to align his cause with that of the Democratic Party in America in order to assist in getting Bush re-elected, because Bin Laden felt that "Bush's strategy in the war on terror was sustaining his own global importance." These examples illustrate the manner in which people use sensationalism and fear in order to simply stay in the media spotlight, an important strategy in the struggle to appropriate and maintain social power. They also show how the material media consumers are asked to interpret as current affairs presented at face value is often blatant manipulation of public opinion by someone with a personal political agenda.
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2010/09/20/100920taco_talk_wright
To tie this to some of the topics we studied in class, I would say this closely relates to the power struggles that corporations and nation states show from time to time. By implementing this 'Big Brother' policy, the government is essentially showing the citizens of India who's boss.
Is this really fair in an era of globalisation where the focus should be on eliminating any remaining barriers between a country and the rest of the world? Interestingly, the article also mentions that countries like United Arab Emirates and Indonesia are also trying to implement similar measures.
I believe this reinforces the belief that a local idea is no longer local because there is a framework for it to go global - even if the idea does little for a society or countryhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/business/global/28secure.html?_r=2&hpw.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_39/b4196021822248.htm
The other piece is a cover story called 'How Facebook sells you' - it starts off with a story about Nike and how advertisers used Facebook as a medium to 'Write the Future.' (You'll see the context when you read the article - the numbers in the article are mind-boggling.) This article is a great education on how social media has kind of pervaded our lives to such an extent that now advertisers and marketers have access to our personal preferences. It's astonishing at how extremely 'user-specific' and targeted the advertising is.
Again, if a media TNC manages to buy Facebook in the future, how powerful would it become seeing as Facebook is probably getting bigger as we speak? The article also mentions a movie called the 'The Social Network' which is about Mark Zuckerberg and the rise of Facebook. It opens in theatres this week - October 1.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_40/b4197064860826.htm?chan=magazine+channel_top+stories
The Solvable Problem of Energy Poverty
Leaving Water for Immigrants
China Imposes Tariff on US Chicken
Summary: China is imposing a tariff on imported US chicken because the low prices are undermining the local market. It reminds me of the documentary about Jamaica, and is a great example of globalization.
Treating of Islamic People in Other Countries
Sunday, September 26, 2010
What is FREE trade?
Mass Rapes in DR Congo - Peacekeepers did NOT do enough to keep victims safe
The UN released a statement saying that the UN peacekeeping forces in the DR Congo did not receive any training as to how to help or protect victims in a situation such as this one and suffered from 'operational constraints.' I'm wondering if this is statement is sufficient to keep the victims, victims' friends and family, and potential future victims from worrying about tomorrow...
I THINK NOT.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Access to Life
What strikes me about the "Access to Life" project is 1) the respect shown for personal narratives and the honesty with which these stories are portrayed, and 2) how the integrated use of images/audio shared through a variety of different channels can effectively raise awareness worldwide. The website is great in allowing easy access to these narratives: http://www.theglobalfund.org/html/accesstolife/en/
A look into the future, from the US government.
http://www.dni.gov/nic/PDF_2025/2025_Global_Trends_Final_Report.pdf
Thursday, September 23, 2010
The Story of Stuff
I know you are all busy and 20 minutes feels like a lot of time, but this is worth it!
http://www.storyofstuff.com/index.php
Google's crime against human culture
https://www.adbusters.org/blogs/blackspot-blog/googles-flaw.html
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
The Agronomist Documentary - Jean Dominique
Here is the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlB7Y7xDB6U&feature=related
You can definitely rent this from the library and should be able to find on Netflix as well.
chinas leaders harness folk religion for their aims
The authority of religious institutions was previously seen by the government as a possible threat to the authority of the communist regime, but now the powers that be are making use of cultural traditions for their own promotion and agendas.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128672542
How important are communication and media for development?
Website:
http://mediamapresource.wordpress.com/about-media-map/
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Haitians given voice--and little else
This article is about the recent installation of suggestion boxes in Haitian refugee camps in which they have no social services and little food availability or contact with the outside world. Suggestion boxes are being used by residents of the camp to voice their misery, make requests or demands and in some cases just to vent. On one hand this seems like a helpful outlet, introducing a kind of alternative media to allow these disenfranchised people to express themselves. On the other hand, though, it also comes across as a misdirected kind of outreach that ties into the Mody and Lee article we are reading for tomorrow which details some theorists' argument that introducing forms of media into the Third World would necessarily result in development. Mody and Lee point out that "Western innovations selected for diffusion did not address the reason why up to one third of the people in Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America did not have basic levels of food clothing and shelter" (pp 95-96). Similarly, in this article about Haitians' use of suggestion boxes and what happens to the letters after they are submitted--they are all read, some aloud on the radio station that is part of the International Organization for Migration communication program--the results seem quite discouraging, especially at the end of the article when the reporter explains that "the $400,000 program was intended to give voice to the voiceless and not food to the hungry or money to the destitute." Perhaps the program will raise awareness and ultimately be helpful in raising funds for these refugees, but it does seem a bit cruel that they are invited to express their plight and make pleas for assistance with the caveat that it is unlikely that anyone will respond.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/world/americas/20haiti.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&th&emc=th
Disney, Chevron and Monsanto Contracted with Blackwater for Intelligence, Training and Security Services
Monday, September 20, 2010
Censorship Project
I've also attached an intriguing YouTube video that supports these topics, and centers on two Fox News journalists who were stiffled and eventually fired by Fox when they tried to report on the MNC Monsanto's use of Bovine Growth Hormone. Fox asserted (as did a Florida court) that the First Amendment enables the media to lie if they want to. This story has many implications concerning the all-too-prevalent power of MNCs to intimidate the media, as well as the media's ability to conceal the truth from viewers/consumers should they deem it necessary for the maintenance of their financial bottom line.
Both are interesting - I hope you enjoy!
www.projectcensored.org
www.youtube.com/watch?v=axU9ngbTxKw
Indonesian Islamists Fear 'Christianization'
English Soccer Hooligans Protest Mosque at Ground Zero
The Right to Remain Silent
Here's the link to the episode's webpage: http://tinyurl.com/32hc79s
or you can listen below.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Island of Flowers
Island of Flowers
NYT Article- Press Freedom
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/business/media/20sources.html?_r=1&ref=world
I thought this article could tie in well with our article "Communicating Rights: Media, Rights Organizations, Education, And the Arts." This article discusses E.U. shield laws.
A shield law provides news reporters with the right to refuse to testify to information/sources of information used while gathering news. Basically, a reporter cannot be forced to reveal a source "a safeguard that many journalists say is necessary for free media to thrive." Europe has relatively strong laws; and, while the U.S. is yet to set any at the national level, many states have such protection for journalists.
Thursday, September 16, 2010
France & the evictions of the Roma
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11332189
French President Sarkovy is reacting angrily to comments by an EU commissioner that were highly critical of the recent evictions of Roma by French authorities.
Do you think that given the tensions regarding immigration throughout many European countries (although the Roma generally aren't immigrants per se), that there is more support for these actions from the public in France and other countries?
How should France handle this controversy? Is Pres. Sarkovy's response the best strategy?